Can I mix ECC and non ECC memory?
Can I mix ECC and non ECC memory?
Can I use Error Correction memory on my BP6? Can I mix in a stick or 2 of Error Correction (ECC) with non ECC memory? Or does it all have to be non ECC memory?
See "Online Video" the internets comedy / opinion webshow, at www.loudmouthtim.com !
well, it says it accepts ECC in the manual as I remember, but I have never tried ECC and nonECC together...
Dual C366@550MHz 1.90V
(History)
yet single PIII-S 512Kb L2 cache at 1400MHz@700MHz
BP6 (not modded yet)
256MB PC133 C2
GF4Ti4200-8x
Maxtor 2x60Gb - all on promise ATA133
Lite-On LTR 40125S@48125W!!!
Plus P4 system

yet single PIII-S 512Kb L2 cache at 1400MHz@700MHz
BP6 (not modded yet)
256MB PC133 C2
GF4Ti4200-8x
Maxtor 2x60Gb - all on promise ATA133
Lite-On LTR 40125S@48125W!!!
Plus P4 system
AFAIK you can mix ECC and non-ECC RAM. The ECC sticks will just not use their ECC capabilities. You can't mix registered and unregistered memory. This is a general rule of thumb, I've no experience with that on the BP6.
BP6, RU BIOS, XP SP3, ACPI, 2x366@523(1,95V), Pentalpha HS + 1x 12cm fan @5V, 768MB, Powercolor Geforce 3, RTL8139D NIC, Terratec EWS64L, Samsung M40 80GB (2,5''), LiteOn CDRW
no prob. for mixing ECC/NonECC
hi there,
there's nor problem with mixing ECC and non-ECC RAM. All that happens
it that bios detects (at least one) non-ECC module and turns off ECC for
the whole RAM. Sad for those modules which would support ECC.
It's not too bad for desktop machines not to have ECC. Modern OS
(yes, even the M$ ones) can correct 1bit RAM I/O errors. It's way slower
than the ECC hardware version. I've read an article which tested ECC
and non-ECC desktop setups. The conclusion was that there's no need for
ECC in desktops unless you're running high load server services.
Just to add something
Atropos
there's nor problem with mixing ECC and non-ECC RAM. All that happens
it that bios detects (at least one) non-ECC module and turns off ECC for
the whole RAM. Sad for those modules which would support ECC.
It's not too bad for desktop machines not to have ECC. Modern OS
(yes, even the M$ ones) can correct 1bit RAM I/O errors. It's way slower
than the ECC hardware version. I've read an article which tested ECC
and non-ECC desktop setups. The conclusion was that there's no need for
ECC in desktops unless you're running high load server services.
Just to add something

Atropos
Specs:
BP6 dual Celeron 433 MHz
Viper V330 graphics
256 MB
3 SCSI2 HDD (1GB, 2GB, 4GB)
W2K / SuSE 9.0 / Zeta RC4 Neo
Note: No scissors any more
BP6 dual Celeron 433 MHz
Viper V330 graphics
256 MB
3 SCSI2 HDD (1GB, 2GB, 4GB)
W2K / SuSE 9.0 / Zeta RC4 Neo
Note: No scissors any more

Re: no prob. for mixing ECC/NonECC
I agree. ECC belongs in the server park where apps are crucial. There is actually a certain overhead of using ECC so it isn't just good news.Atropos wrote:It's not too bad for desktop machines not to have ECC. Modern OS (yes, even the M$ ones) can correct 1bit RAM I/O errors. It's way slower than the ECC hardware version. I've read an article which tested ECC
and non-ECC desktop setups. The conclusion was that there's no need for
ECC in desktops unless you're running high load server services.
2x533MHz@544MHz, 2.0V
640MB PC100 memory
Realtek RTL-8139 NIC
Maxtor 6Y080L0 80GB hdd
Debian Linux stable with 2.4.8 kernel
640MB PC100 memory
Realtek RTL-8139 NIC
Maxtor 6Y080L0 80GB hdd
Debian Linux stable with 2.4.8 kernel